TY - JOUR
T1 - Feedback and Assessment in Higher-Education, Practice-Based Entrepreneurship Courses: How Can We Build Legitimacy?
AU - Warhuus, Jan
AU - Blenker, Per
AU - Elmholdt, Stine Trolle
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - When educators teach entrepreneurship experientially in higher education, a need arises for different procedures for assessment, evaluation and feedback, and the legitimacy of this type of course is often questioned. In traditional courses, students accumulate knowledge and the educator’s primary concern is what students learn. When learning ‘through’ practising entrepreneurship, students and educators must also care about how students learn. While research brought awareness to this area of concern more than a decade ago, feedback and assessment in entrepreneurship education have received very limited attention. This article addresses these issues both theoretically and empirically. The findings allow the authors to map out the feedback mechanisms needed in experimental entrepreneurship education and to provide an embedded two-by-two model that describes the purpose and outcome of the feedback. The findings also suggest an approach for design and assessment that may help resolve the pedagogical and legitimacy challenges of such courses. These contributions are directly relevant for students, educators and administrators involved with entrepreneurship courses, and they may be applicable to a wider range of process-based courses.
AB - When educators teach entrepreneurship experientially in higher education, a need arises for different procedures for assessment, evaluation and feedback, and the legitimacy of this type of course is often questioned. In traditional courses, students accumulate knowledge and the educator’s primary concern is what students learn. When learning ‘through’ practising entrepreneurship, students and educators must also care about how students learn. While research brought awareness to this area of concern more than a decade ago, feedback and assessment in entrepreneurship education have received very limited attention. This article addresses these issues both theoretically and empirically. The findings allow the authors to map out the feedback mechanisms needed in experimental entrepreneurship education and to provide an embedded two-by-two model that describes the purpose and outcome of the feedback. The findings also suggest an approach for design and assessment that may help resolve the pedagogical and legitimacy challenges of such courses. These contributions are directly relevant for students, educators and administrators involved with entrepreneurship courses, and they may be applicable to a wider range of process-based courses.
KW - Assessment
KW - course design
KW - entrepreneurial learning
KW - experiential learning
KW - feedback
KW - legitimacy
UR - https://digitalcommons.stmarys-ca.edu/school-economics-business-faculty-works/355
UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950422217750795
U2 - 10.1177/0950422217750795
DO - 10.1177/0950422217750795
M3 - Article
VL - 32
JO - Industry and Higher Education
JF - Industry and Higher Education
ER -